Isaac Was Abraham's Only Child; Ishmael Was Not His Biological Child, According To Apostle Suleman - Legitvibes Link

: In mainstream theology, the distinction is usually made between legitimacy in the covenant rather than biological paternity.

While Suleman’s teaching focuses on the name change and spiritual status, the Bible traditionally records both as sons of the same man: : In mainstream theology, the distinction is usually

: The teaching aligns with the broader theological view that Ishmael was a "son of the flesh" (born of human effort through Hagar), while Isaac was the "son of the promise" (born through divine intervention). Broader Biblical Context Since God changed Abram's name to Abraham specifically

: He argues that Ishmael was born to Abram , whereas Isaac was born to Abraham . Since God changed Abram's name to Abraham specifically for the covenant of promise, Suleman asserts that Ishmael belongs to the "old" identity and Isaac to the "new". : In mainstream theology

youtube.com/watch?v=PvD41obVdwI">Spirit of Ishmael and its impact on the church?