Abortion - Mr Validity May 2026

: Direct reports from facilities are considered more reliable for estimating population subgroups, though they often underestimate true incidence due to variations in state laws and patient characteristics [10].

: Mandated in several jurisdictions to track adverse events, though criteria for what constitutes a "complication" can vary [23].

: Total reported abortions decreased by 2% from 2021 to 2022 in continuously reporting areas [12]. Challenges to Data Integrity abortion - Mr Validity

: Includes patient demographics (age, race, residency), gestational age, and the method used [7, 26].

: There is a lack of consensus on the most appropriate indicators, with a scoping review identifying over 790 different indicators used across various studies, suggesting a critical need for standardization [16]. Key Reporting Requirements & Standards : Direct reports from facilities are considered more

Most states require abortion providers to submit specific reports to ensure legal and medical compliance [7, 13]:

: The overturning of Roe v. Wade has led to concerns that state reporting requirements could be used for surveillance or criminalization, potentially affecting the willingness of providers or patients to report accurately [13]. Challenges to Data Integrity : Includes patient demographics

: New scales, such as the Person-Centered Abortion Care scale , are being validated to measure the quality of both in-person and telemedicine medication abortion care [33].